Why You Should Think Twice before Immersing Yourself in Van Gogh

Choosing to visit the much-hyped immersive experience may depend on how you feel about ‘Emily in Paris’ & condoms.

Photo by Redd on Unsplash

The immersive exhibits built around the Dutch painter who famously cut off his ear might be more appropriately named the Van Gogh prophylactic experience.

I don’t mean to trash the exhibit that’s attracted millions in 29 American cities this year. But now that I can say “been there, done that” I do feel it was a bit like wearing a raincoat during sex. It’s certainly better than nothing. But deep down you know you’re not getting the real deal.

And maybe that’s the point. If so, it’s a good one.

These global Van Gogh immersive extravaganzas — there are at least six — have reached millions all over the world. People are flocking to see the things. I’m glad of that. It proves that folks are interested in art, especially Van Gogh. Though I’m not sure why.

I’m also not sure if a Matisse immersive experience would be quite so effective at captivating public attention. Picasso might. He’ll get his own immersive treatment in Toronto later this year. There are also similar shows for Monet, Klimt, and Banksy. Maybe Salvador…